A Few Thoughts on the 90% Bonus Tax.

Quote of the Day:

“We figure the local and state governments will take care of the other 10 percent.”

Rep. Charley Rangel's explanation for the 90% tax on tarp recipients bonus payments.


Counterquote of the Day:

"No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."
-- Mark Twain (1866)

Holy Smoke, America!! Did this really just happen to us? The American colonies rebel yell against England was "taxation without representation is tyranny!" Now we have a 90% tax rate with representation!! Perhaps it is time for another tax rebellion. The Senate is proposing a 70% tax on bonus payments, 35% paid by the company and the other 35% paid by the recipients. Even that is way too high. I think our representatives need to take a real deep breath, exhale slowly, then read the Constitution. Is this what they want for our future generations? I think not. This bill was composed mainly to make the most political hay over the public's distress over the bonus payments. It scares me how quickly this bill was passed. Congress, especially the house financial services committee, used delaying tactics and dogged resistance to prevent reform or overhaul of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac for years. If they had acted half as fast on reform of these GSEs, (government sponsored enterprises, more on this later) the USA could have avoided the super recession we are experiencing and just had a nice regular recession that goes away in a year or two. If Congress can pass such outrageous tax bills for one reason, I am certain they will be able to think of more. Who knows, maybe all the opponents of war will tax the extra pay for overseas and dangerous duty military people receive.

Since the unions and activists have arranged busloads of people to hike to the AIG executives homes, would it not be fair to let the overtime pay of union workers be taxed the same as bonuses for people who do not get paid by the hour but by results? When it comes down to brass tacks, overtime is just another bonus. Since the UAW get paid when they are out of work, congress could really clean up here.

If the unions and activists cared more about all the taxpayers and not just the unionized ones, they would also organize a march in DC to all the congresspeople's DC homes to lodge complaints about their micromismanagement of this financial fiasco. Remember, all this started with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, not AIG.

Another day another line in the sand drawn

The Federal Reserve Board announced an $85 billion loan to AIG in exchange for a 79.9% equity stake in the company. The Fed, along with the US Treasury, consider AIG too big, too interconnected to fail. The good news is the Fed might actually turn a profit on the deal. The Fed's hope is that AIG will be able to ride out the current storm in the credit markets and get back on its feet again. When that occurs, the Fed will cash in their equity stake and pay back the loan. Let's hope this works.
Apparently the "line in the sand" the Fed drew with Lehman Brothers can shift. It seems that sand line is actually calculated on a case by case basis. The criteria being how big the company is and what impact its failure will be on the US and world economy. Lehman Brothers just didn't qualify for a direct bailout. A year ago LEH's market capitalization was $33 billion, now it's in bankruptcy proceedings and selling off its assets at bargain basement prices. Barclays bank is offering $250 million for LEH's North American investment banking and trading operations. Barclays is also paying $1.5 billion for the LEH New York headquarters and 2 New Jersey data centers. The deal is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court. The deal would save almost 10,000 LEH employees from job loss. This makes me believe the court will have no problems with it, unless it considers the price way,way,way too low.
Here's another interesting development in the LEH bankruptcy, JPMorgan Chase (JPM)advanced LEH $87 million Monday morning to allow LEH to continue its trading operations and avoid disruptions to financial markets. The New York Federal Reserve Board reimbursed JPM for this. Apparently the treasury secretary's refusal to bail out LEH did not apply to loans made after no deal was reached and LEH decided to file chapter 11 bankruptcy. On Tuesday, JPM advanced LEH another $51 million. The bankruptcy court judge also appointed JPM as LEH's clearing house for its trading operation during the proceeding. This means that JPM has put $138 million into LEH to fund its trading operations in 2 days. This is over 50% of Barc's offer of $250 million for trading and investment banking operations. What this means is beyond me, if anyone out there has any knowledge on this please share it in the comments section.